Thursday, July 10, 2008

Frank Vincent DuMond and the Prismatic Palette


I wish I could say that I was extremely experienced with the DuMond palette, but in truth, I am not.  I have never painted using this philosophy of color, nor have I ever even mixed this palette in its entirety.  However, in the context of my previous posts, and my concentration on artistic legacies and unique palettes, I feel it is important to introduce this topic now.  I only hope that other artists more experienced with this method than am I will add their knowledge to the outline I provide here.

Frank Vincent DuMond (1865 - 1951), was an American illustrator and impressionist painter, 
who, despite his talent and success, will probably best be remembered as a teacher, a distinction of which he would likely be very proud.   After studying at the Art Students League of New York
 City and then at the Académie Julian under Benjamin Constant, Gustave Boulanger, and Jules-Joseph Lefebvre, DuMond went on to become one of America's greatest art instructors.  During his nearly sixty years of teaching at the League, and at the League's Lyme Summer School in Connecticut, his students included the likes of Georgia O'Keefe, Norman Rockwell, Frank Mason, Everett Raymond Kinstler, Arthur Maynard, and Frank Reilly.

DuMond's innovation in his impressionistic painting, and in his teaching of painting, was the Prismatic Palette.  Unlike those artists today who consider their palettes to be prismatic just because they employ a full range of colors, DuMond actually based his color layout on the prism, and on the visual perception of color in atmospheric perspective.  In other words, his palette represented the three dimensional model of lightwaves in perspective, laid out with the understanding that yellow, orange, and red are predominant in close objects, while blue and violet have a stronger influence on distant objects.

The representation below, though poor, shows DuMond's universal principles of the Prismatic Palette.  It is very logically laid out, with the top row containing the colors of the spectrum, the second row contains grays to neutralize colors as they recede, the third row blues (cobalt blue + white) in corresponding values, and the final row, a variety of mixed greens (primarily cadmium yellow light and ultramarine blue).   The greens in the final row have been shifted according to atmospheric color [the green on the left contains the most yellow, while the green at the darkest value contains the most red and red-blue]. 


Paintings are begun with the middle values (around the value of cadmium red from the tube), and from there, color is adjusted according to the relative atmosphere as you move forward or backward in the picture plane.  Light goes toward shadow from yellow to red to violet on the warm side, and from yellow to green to blue green to violet on the cool side.  As colors recede, they contain less yellow.

It is obvious to see where Frank J. Reilly got the inspiration for his own palette, though he modified his choices based primarily on indoor portraiture and on the guiding principles of Munsell's color notation.  Reilly must have absorbed the logical approach in DuMond's prismatic color control, and saw another, more personal use for its utilization.

John Phillip Osborne

Although Reilly's palette seems better known, DuMond's palette is still taught and used by a variety of artists today.  Arthur Maynard (1920-1991), another student of DuMond, taught the prismatic palette at the Art Students League for several years before going on to found the Ridgewood Art Institute ("The Barn"), in Ridgewood, NJ, where he continued to instruct students in the use of DuMond's color control system for 41 years.  Maynard's students, like John Phillip Osborne, continue to teach the system at RAI, as do some of his students, such as Diana Gibson.

I invite any and all who can correct my information or add to it, to please leave comments on this post, for my own education and for any others who might come across it.


14 comments:

Kristy Gordon said...

Wow! That's neat the way that Dumond organized his pallette to make it easy to describe the atmospheric effects of perspective! It was cool to read about who studied under him and stuff too! And wow, I sure do like that John Phillip Osborne painting you included! Thanks for this Matt!!

jeff f said...

Hello Matt,
This is a great subject and one that is close to my heart.

I studied with Frank Mason who took over the DuMond class after his death in 1951 at the ASL. He still teaches in the same studio but he's almost 87 and from what I hear not doing well.

I studied with him for 3,1/2 years and he took the class to Vermont every summer for a month to paint landscape.

Frank would demos on this palette and the ideas you have already put forth.

Basically your right on about the palette. It was based heavily on the use of Cadmiums and all the values were related to colors on the palette. For example he would talk of Orange value gray and then move down to find the same value of Violet and Green.

Here is his palette:
Titanium White and Ivory Black.

1: Windsor Newton best-quality cadmium lemon yellow
2: Windsor Newton best-quality cadmium yellow light
3: cadmium yellow medium
4: cadmium yellow deep
5: cadmium orange
6: yellow ochre
7: Windsor Newton best-quality cadmium red light
8: cadmium red medium
9: cadmium red deep
10: alizarin crimson
11: cerulean or manganese blue
12: cobalt blue
13: ultramarine blue
14: pthalo blue
15: pthalo green

extra colors:

raw sienna
burnt sienna
raw umbra
burnt umbra
veridian
green earth


Frank added a line of Violet so you had the full spectrum colors, then the grays, then violets, blues, greens, and he would add more triads of high value pinks and blues(pthalo blue).

Hope this helps, it's a hard palette to master due to all the cadmiums but the key is the grays for studio painting and the violets and blues for outdoors.

jeff f said...

Sorry I forgot to add Orange value is the lowest value before turning into the shadow value. Cad Red is already in shadow as a value. Of course this can vary due to time of day but the edge or where light turns into shadow, (which we mixed from Cobalt Blue and Cad Red)in a north light studio during the day is orange value and the middle is Yellow Ocher.

jeff f said...

Mason mixed the greens from a Violet.
He would have you mix this from Ultramarine Blue and Alizarin.
It was Purple/Blue in Munsell this would be 10PB-2/10

If you wanted it to be a little more towards Red then 2.5P-2/10.

Then you mix this with Cadmium Yellow Light. The greens would be mixed up to value 6 on Munsell or Orange value.

Then you would mix the last 3 values using Pthalo Green and Cadmium Yellow Lemon. You can also use Viridian instead of Pthalo as it's less chromatic and intense.
From there you bring up the values with white.

We would mix to a maple leaf as this was the predominant green in Vermont and it was a way of gaging if the green was getting to acidic.

Belinda Del Pesco said...

Very thought-provoking and mind-challenging post... I've never heard of Mr. DuMond, and his palette idea is amazing. Thanks so much for taking the time to put all this down.

Diana Gibson said...

I have in my possession a marvelous book that details DuMond's teaching and philosophies. The publication is "DuMond, The Harmony of Nature: The Art and Life of Frank Vincent DuMond" published by the Florence Griswald Museum. The quotes are chock full of knowledge, and hence deserve sharing.....

"The word 'value' became for students the keystone of DuMond's more technical teaching. 'Values refer to a range of steps in painting from light to dark. White and yellow, for instance, are light values. Orange, yellow ochre, and red light are middle values. Browns, blues, other reds and black are dark values. DuMond students learned to talk in values which led directly to DuMond's theories on 'keying' a painting."

"DuMond taught pre-mixing of paint in portrait, figure, and landscape painting. This may appear to be a formula but it was not; it was a mere starting point for a bewildered beginner. The pre-mixing of oil colors for landscape painting was also done by students. Eight equal steps of oil paint from white to black were mixed and put into tubes. Then a blue series was mixed and finally steps from an intense yellow-green to a more neutral , dark green. A landscape student would then have twenty-four tubes readily available on his or her palette. This system simplified the beginner's huge challenge when presented with a ten-mile vista to paint. These were proper controls and not a formula. They led the student to an extremely close scrutiny of value and color relationships." p. 25

"DuMond was an extraordinary colorist. Light passing through a glass prism, he showed, is broken up into the colors of the rainbow as it passes through the spectrum from gold to violet. For the searching eye of the artist the colors of the rainbow are everywhere. Find them and use them, DuMond would say." p. 26

Tony Perrotta said...

I have to agree with Diana that Dumond created the palette to help his students understand values and planes. I have done a bit of research on the palette as well as Frank Reilly's teachings. I think Reilly just took the Dumond palette to the extreme. As a student I am using the Dumond palette still. Not 100% of the time but when I want to make it easier on myself I do. As Diana said it was developed to Teach values, although alot of accomplished painters stil use it everyday. Some artists that learned and were trained with the palette have moved on to a more limited group of colors on their now but the knowledge they learned with the Dumond values stays with them for life. Some say the palette limits the artist in color and value I don't agree with that. the artist can mix his or her own strings of their favorite hues and values and go with it. There is no limit what one can mix to fit their style.

Tony

TNash said...

My friend Joe Paquet is a wonderful landscape artist who studied with Osborne and teaches the prismatic approach. This is his site: http://www.joepaquet.com/

I recognized the similarity in concept with the Reilly approach I had learned through Faragasso and others. It can be easily misunderstood, but to an artist looking to understand a variety of ways to think about the visual world I found it very interesting and helpful.

paul michael said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
modman said...

Interesting history.... I thought you might like to see some photos of Arthur Maynard's and Frank Giovanazzi's paintings that were recently added to the world wide web:

http://www.rainbowdesign.com/maynard.html

peace

Richard Piloco said...

Hi Mat,

Very informative blog! Thanks

Diane Kominick-Ouzoonian said...

I have just started using this palette after many years of painting. It is so helpful,wish I knew of it sooner!

Francis said...

I have a question and I hope someone can help me. If the colors lose there yellow as the recede in the distance, what happens to blue and red since they have no yellow in them.

Francis said...

I have a question I hope someone can answer. If yellow is the color that lessens in the distance, what happens to blue, red, and violet as they recede in the distance?
Thank you